My blog posts since 2024 sound like a broken record:
Our toothless chihuahuas in Canada ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war. Our toothless chihuahuas in Canada ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war. Our toothless chihuahuas in Canada ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war. … Our toothless chihuahuas in Canada ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war.
Not surprisingly, the topic of this blog post is our toothless chihuahuas in Canada ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war. I know, I know, a broken record and it’s only natural for you ask why I’m going on about the same topic in this blog post. I’ll explain shortly.
The Freedom Rising (FR) weekly Friday meetings have stopped. That’s a good thing. Over 5 years, no meaningful results were produced in or as a result of these meetings. I referred to these meetings as pointless Show-n-Tell sessions because they ignored the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war.
FR has been reincarnated as Canadians Rising (CR) and this group holds Friday weekly meetings. The meeting format is the same, meaning this group also appears intent on ignoring the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war.
I am a member of CR. I am a dissident voice about our toothless chihuahuas for openly expressing what should be common sense and obvious to them; we ignore the fundamentals of what we must do to fight and win this global war. You’ve heard the expression, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!” Well, I’ve been fooled by our toothless chihuahuas more than a few times since 2020. No more. In 2024, I began mocking and ridiculing our toothless chihuahuas for ignoring the fundamentals. Chuckle, a few members have already hinted I should be banned from CR for my heresy.
Permit me to go off on a short tangent. It explains why I wrote this blog post.
Yesterday, I had a pleasant surprise. I received Ted Kuntz’s email notification at noon that I’m supposed to give a 15 minute presentation in today’s CR meeting on the topic of, “Ian will share HIS proposed solutions and what he is working on to bring those solutions to fruition”. Notice the word “HIS” is capitalized. LOL, someone is trying to make a point. I knew nothing about this and hadn’t been contacted by anyone from CR. Late yesterday afternoon, at 17:54, the committee member Olga Jenny was gracious enough to inform me by email that I’m presenting in today’s meeting. The committee was also gracious enough to decide the topic of discussion for me, naturally without checking with me. Might I suggest the CR committee be gracious enough to give my presentation today as it seems to know what it wants me to say. John Graf is also talking in today’s meeting. I’m sure Olga only informed John yesterday afternoon and also chose his subject topic. Anyways, I’ll certainly follow the committee’s lead and wait until the last minute to tell the committee I won’t be presenting today but that I’ll graciously accept to address a topic of my own choice in another meeting. And if you must know, Olga’s last minute email is what prompted me to write this blog post.
Let’s get back to this blog post.
So what are these “fundamentals” and what do I mean by “meaningful results”? I’ve answered these questions in my few blog posts since 2024, of which there are only 24, including this one. They are all relatively short. The only excuse my critics have for ignoring my talking points is either they prefer to speak from a position of ignorance or it opens a can of worms that reflects very poorly on them. If my talking points were so wrong and my critics could have then they would have shredded me by now.
Here is an example of a fundamental for which I mock and ridicule our toothless chihuahuas. We are in a global war, something all our toothless chihuahuas here in Canada accept as fact. So the big question is, who is our enemy we must defeat and eliminate so we win this global war? After all, you can’t win a war if you don’t know who your enemy is. FYI, this ain’t a trivial question. Knowing our enemy is what drives EVERYTHING we must do to fight and win this global war.1 So how do our toothless chihuahuas answer this question? The surprising and abysmal response from our toothless chihuahuas is: 1) the deer-in-the-head-lights look, that is, they don’t know or, 2) ask 100 toothless chihuahuas and you get 100 different answers, that is, again they don’t know. Our toothless chihuahuas NEVER talk about winning this global war, NEVER talk about defeating our enemy and haven’t even identified our enemy we must defeat to win this global war. Go figure!
The purpose of this blog post is to focus on one specific fundamental that our toothless chihuahuas ignore. This is the fundamental of OSMRs (objective, strategy, metric, expected result and final result). Why focus on OSMRs when there are many other fundamentals our toothless chihuahuas ignore? I’ll get to that in a minute.
What about “meaningful results”, what does this refer to? This refers to anything we do that moves us closer to defeating and eliminating our enemy, you know, what actually wins this global war for us. You can immediately see the problem here.
First, we haven’t identified our enemy and there is no consensus among our toothless chihuahuas about who our enemy is. “Meaningful results” are specifically defined in terms of defeating and eliminating our enemy. If we can’t identify our enemy then we can’t produce any meaningful results for the obvious reason nothing we do moves us closer to defeating and eliminating our enemy.
Second, even if our toothless chihuahuas eventually identify our enemy, what is it that determines if they produce meaningful results, that “moves us closer to defeating and eliminating our enemy”? This is where OSMRs come into play. Metrics, the “M” in OSMRs, are about quantifying and measuring how effective a strategy is, to assess whether the strategy is succeeding or failing to reach an objective. Our primary objective is to win this global war by defeating and eliminating our enemy. 2 Metrics are therefore about measuring and quantifying if what we do (i.e. our strategy) moves us closer to defeating and eliminating our enemy (i.e. our objective).
So what is the problem? The problem is our toothless chihuahuas either have poorly defined objectives and strategies or simply don’t define them. For obvious reasons, they never define metrics. For obvious reasons, they intentionally ignore results. They ignore expected results and don’t report final results. A proposed action initiative without clearly defined OSMRs is nothing more than an idea without a means to implement it, it is guaranteed to fail. To win this global war, we must be goal and results oriented. OSMRs provides the means, the process, by which we become goal and results oriented. The reason our toothless chihuahuas don’t define OSMRs is because that would demonstrate they have nothing more than an idea with no means to implement it, that they simply don’t know what they are doing in fighting this global war.
What is a more important reason why is it an absolute MUST for our toothless chihuahuas to explicitly and clearly defined OSMRs for EVERYTHING they do? The answer is simple. For any action initiative proposed by our toothless chihuahuas to have the possibility of producing meaningful results requires the support from large scale numbers of our rank-and-file in Canada. We’re talking millions of people. It’s all about and only our large scale numbers. No large scale numbers? No meaningful results! If OSMRs are not defined then the action initiative is guaranteed to fail and our rank-and-file can confidently know their their support would be waste of time and scarce resources. Meaningful results are all about and only about defeating and eliminating our enemy. And we can’t defeat and eliminate our enemy with only a few thousand people, which is all our toothless chihuahuas in Canada can currently hope to organize and mobilize.
We’ve all been fooled into supporting action initiatives that failed to achieve their supposed objectives. With the benefit of hindsight, they failed because there was no game plan, the OSMRs were poorly defined. Moving forward, expecting and demanding our toothless chihuahuas to explicitly and clearly define their OSMRs is how we assess the viability of every proposed action initiative, whether the action initiative deserve our support or will just waste our time and scarce resources.
Want a few example? Sure you do!
CR hasn’t defined it OSMRs. For example, what is the purpose of this group, what is it’s primary objective? The answer is we don’t know and the CR committee doesn’t tell us. From the CR Substack article “Welcome to Canadians Rising” post, all we get is:
“The idea is simple: bring people together, hear from interesting and knowledgeable guest, share information, ask questions, and give people an opportunity to connect with others who are paying attention to what is happening in their communities and across Canada“.
Most members of CR have 5 years of FR meeting experience under their belts. All members, especially those on the “Committee” leading this group, are fully aware we are in a global war and that our enemy has swamped us with a tsunami of problems. We are literally fighting for the right to be alive and have a future. To win this war, we must become goal and results oriented. We must produce “meaningful results”, results that literally move us closer to defeating and eliminating our enemy. Our primary objective is to win this global war. This is what is expected and demanded from the CR committee leading this group. Instead, all we have is the bland, vacuous and meaningless statement “The idea is simple…”. The committee hasn’t defined it’s OSMRs because it doesn’t know what they are; it doesn’t know how to fight and win this global war.
Here is another example. Connie Shields and Shelagh McFarlane gave presentations in the 2026-09-25 CR meeting. Connie is a committee member leading the CR group.
Connie talked about her Cage of Consent video series. If this was Connie’s first article and videos then she would deserve top marks. But that’s not the case. I’ve been following Connie for some time, she’s not new to the game of freedom fighting. Connie’s not telling us anything new that hasn’t been covered by many others such as Whitney Webb, Patrick, Woods, Catherine Austin Fitts, James Corbett, Iain Davis, David Hughes, etc. So here’s the question. What is it Connie is doing with her Cage of Consent information and what is it she wants us to do with it? What exactly is her objective behind these videos? The answer is we don’t know and she doesn’t tell us. Connie hasn’t defined her OSMRs but instead leaves it to our imagination to decide, what, if any, they might be. Does Shelagh McFarlane’s presentation offer a solution to the problems Connie talks about? Nope! I don’t have time to go into more details about Connie because I want to get this post out before today’s CR meeting. After all, this is so last minute.
Let’s quickly move onto Shelagh McFarlane’s presentation. I’ve read Shelagh’s POGG primer. I’ve spent time on her website. I’ve heard her talk a few times. Shelagh has an idea about municipal councils and is trying to figure out how to implement it. There are at least a few CR members who appear to understand the information she presents. I’m not one of them. Like many other people and groups (e.g. One Peoples Public Trust, Gather 2030, Cal Washington, Kathleen Acker, Marcel Bessette, Christopher James, etc) Shelagh bounces different terms and concepts around without substantiating or proving they are true. I’ve wasted many months trying to understand what these people and groups have to say. I’ve found, for example, they use vague and poorly defined concepts and ideas, they often contradict each other. Who is right or wrong? Hell if I know! So is Shelagh’s information right or wrong? I don’t know and I’m not going to waste any more time trying to prove to myself she knows what she’s talking about. That’s her responsibility and she needs to convince the large scale number of us whose support she critically needs. What we must expect and demand from Shelagh is that she explicitly and clearly define her OSMRs, so all of us can assess her proposed action initiative to see if she has a viable game plan and a reasonable probability of reaching her objectives, whatever they might be. I don’t know what her OSMRs are and I haven’t found where, if at all, she has defined them. As a simple example, Shelagh has stated our municipalities across Canada are “Global Municipal Administrations” which must be restored to “Public Local Administrations”. If this is indeed her objective then she needs to define her strategies, metrics, results for achieving this objective, otherwise all she has is an idea with no means to implement it. And no, getting a dozen or so people to run for municipal office is not a substitute for OSMRs. To repeat, Shelagh must have the large scale support of our rank-and-file across Canada and she will only get that by convincing us her OSMRs are sound. She hasn’t done this.
Now about Olga’s invite. An invitation to speak at the last minute and telling me what to talk about is not about hearing what I have to say. It’s about shutting me up and shutting me down in future meetings, saying I had my chance to speak. If the CR committee is still interested in getting my input then it knows how to contact me. Hey Olga, don’t leave it again until the last minute.
Footnotes
1 In my blog posts, I identify our enemy as the Cabal and it’s global network. For example, in my February, 2024 blog post, I wrote, “Who is our real enemy? It is the State of London, the Vatican State and the State of Washington DC. It is the central banks and the Bank of International Settlements. It is the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization and the United Nations. It is Google, Facebook, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Palantir, Blackrock Vanguard and State Street. It is the Rothschilds, the Klaus Schwabs, the George Soros and the Bill Gates of our world. It is every trillionaire and billionaire. It is the most powerful people, families, businesses and institutions that are waging their war of Technocracy and Transhumanism against us, the little people. This is the face of our real enemy. These are the elite criminals and their network that we must defeat and eliminate if we are to win this war.”
2 I am unaware of a single person or group in Canada that has defined what our